<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ai-Stack on SaaS Tech Watch</title><link>https://saastechwatch.com/tags/ai-stack/</link><description>Recent content in Ai-Stack on SaaS Tech Watch</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://saastechwatch.com/tags/ai-stack/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What Is Actually Portable in the AI Stack: An Exit-Cost Read for Buyers</title><link>https://saastechwatch.com/posts/2026-06-30-what-is-actually-portable-in-the-ai-stack-an-exit-cost-read-for-buyers/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://saastechwatch.com/posts/2026-06-30-what-is-actually-portable-in-the-ai-stack-an-exit-cost-read-for-buyers/</guid><description>&lt;p>The AI lock-in conversation is mostly conducted at the wrong altitude. Buyers ask &amp;ldquo;can we switch model providers?&amp;rdquo; and the answer, delivered at conference panels, is &amp;ldquo;yes, the APIs are mostly compatible.&amp;rdquo; That answer is technically true and practically misleading. It conflates the portability of a chat completion call with the portability of a working system that took eighteen months to build.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This piece separates what genuinely moves between vendors from what does not, and prices the exit accordingly.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>